ML:Good evening I'm a Mary Lahammer and welcome to this governors forum. It's a partnership between TPT and AARP. For the next hour we're going to talk to the three leading candidates for governor about issues of special importance to Minnesotans older than fifty. But many of these issues, the state budget the economy, health care are important to all of us. So don't go anywhere, the debate begins in just a few seconds. Announcer: Governor debate older Minnesotans speak is a co-production of AARP, online AARP.org/MN and TPT's Minnesota Channel. (Music) ML:Thanks for joining us, and a special welcome to those listening to this debate tonight on radio stations across the state. Let's hit the ground running. With us tonight are the three top candidates on the ballot for governor. They're here because each has received more than five percent support in an independent statewide poll. The rules tonight are simple: This is a conversation, not a formal debate. You won't see any podiums, no stopwatches, no robert's rules of order. So let's get going. Here are the candidates in alphabetical order Mark Dayton is the Democrat running in the race. He's a former US Senator Tom Emmer is the Republican on the ballot. He's currently a state lawmaker. Tom Horner is the standard bearer for the Independence Party. He's a long-time twin cities public relations executive. Well first question gentlemen. Kind of the news of the week, we all got more details on each of your budget plans and it all presented some hurdles too, for you ahead. Let's start with you Representative Emmer because you've released the third and final part of your budget and one aspect that could be difficult going forward is cutting education --higher education in Minnesota. So how does a candidate for governor run in Minnesota saying you're going to cut education, specifically higher ed? TE:Well actually Mary what we did this week is we put out the only balanced budget that has been presented. I think it's more than anybody... I'm told it's more than anybody's ever done in running for an office like this. We put out budget targets in every area of government. For instance in the K-12 area, I know you've talked about higher ed, we're adding five hundred million dollars. If you look at... ML: Your opponents may differ with that. TE: If you look... well they might try to but the reason they're going to defer is because you're really looking at two different ways of doing this. One we believe that the state has to live within its means. ML: Right TE: You have to start purchasing the services that people expect from government within the revenues the government has. And the reality is that the next Governor, the next legislature will have almost seven percent, seven to eight percent, more to spend, than the current one, about 3 billion more. ML: OK, how about specifically on higher ed? It's a four hundred million dollar cut. Isn't that fair? TE: That is. That is. ML:Is it going to mean higher tuition? TE:Well I sure hope not. I mean we will challenge both the uh the university of Minnesota and the MNSCU system, we will challenge them to work within what we're talking about and try to come up with efficiencies. The idea is to make sure that we all live within our means not just uh one entity of government. ML: OK. Senator Dayton you also had the department of revenue runyour tax increase plan and it came up short,nearly two billion dollars short. Tell me what you think you're going to do to fill that hole for the revenue. Are you going to have to increase said income tax more, drop down to lower earners workers, go to other tax increases, more cuts? what are you going to do to fill that hole? MD:The reason that it came up short was because of the income levels I set for beginning any tax increase would affect, the Department of Revenue said, three point eight percent of taxpayers in Minnesota, so... ML:Do you disagree with that? MD: No. I agree with their analysis, it's certainly... others have said that I know this is about the taxing middle-class and in fact it's clear that my proposal would affect...would not affect not over ninety six percent of taxpayers... ML: But are going have to dip down and affect the middle class? MD:So I'll look for other sources of revenue. We'll have to look for additional cuts. And that's what I'm in the process of doing now. ML: OK, let me jump in. What other sources of revenue, you know sales taxes? What other taxes? MD: Well, this is just one component, is raising the income tax rates. So we're looking at other ways of making taxes more progressive in Minnesota and that's my commitment ML:Other taxes, but... MD:And if I become Governor, I'll work with the Revenue and other authorities to find areas where we can continue to look to make revenues come on a more progressive basis. And that's the real difference between myself and the two gentlemen here. ML:Are you committed to leaving your income tax increase proposal as is. Could it go up higher? Could you reach down lower? MD: No I said I would keep the rate below the top rate in the country which is eleven percent. These two scenarios we ran were 10.85 and 10.95 percent but again affecting less than four percent of all taxpayers, only the very top four percent . ML: Other taxes you won't specify yet what you're looking at? MD: You know I'm looking right now. ML: OK MD: We'll see. ML: Speaking of other taxes, Mister Horner, you talked about other taxes and this week you came out with a jobs plan. TH: Right ML:People mention that you didn't know how many jobs it would create and you also got a little criticism for saying they were old ideas and it wasn't out of the box for this third-party candidate who needs to be out of the box. TH: Well I didn't say they were old ideas. I think some of the %uh the folks from the Democratic and Republican parties have said they were old ideas. You know, it, it's a collection of good ideas that says that Minnesota is not going to grow, we're not going to have economic expansion if we're Johnny-one-notes. If we just believe that we can cut our way to success or we can tax our way to success. So my tax plan that says that we ought to encourage businesses to invest and so the the tax proposals I have in there are tax cuts that are are paid to companies that are investing in research and development. Buying new equipment... ML: Is that new? Is that innovative? Is that out of the box? TH: It is the kind of proposal that people say will grow the economy. Now where I do have some innovation uh is is in saying that as a state we ought to fund research at the University of Minnesota at other two and four year schools. I've created some innovation funds so that we are open to new ideas. ML: How about jobs? Do you have a tally yet on how many jobs...a ballpark? TH:No, but, but lookit, I mean all of us have put out jobs programs and none of us has been able to to say specifically it will create this many jobs. You know I think what, what Minnesotans have from the three of us frankly is is a very good sense of how each of us would govern, of the priorities each of us would set. Um, and and in my case I think that that Minnesota needs to have a balanced approach. I think we need to make investments in education, in the future and grow jobs that way. ML:Okay we're going to talk more about the state budget in just a minute. But first let's hear from some Minnesotans on the topic. We went to the state fair a few weeks back to talk to voters about the economic issues they were most worried about here's what we found out. Woman at State Fair: I think it's important that the candidates are able to cross partisan lines to be able to solve the budget crisis and not really become entrenched in agendas in order to help frame the issue on the budget. Man at state fair: I think one of the things they need to do is look at cutting the taxes. Lower the taxes especially for businesses. Cause the more money that's flowed into the the community they're eventually going to come out ahead money wise with it I believe. Man at state fair: It's reality. If we if we expect services, they need to be paid for and uh uh if the if it takes taxes to do that um that's the way it has to be. Man at state fair: Given the condition of the economy right now I don't think raising taxes makes any sense at all. While the economy in Minnesota is nowhere near as bad as it's is in Arizona or Nevada We'll still have trouble here and raising taxes or only hurt that. We have to learn to cut spending and we have cut waste. Woman at state fair: It would be nice to reduce some expenditures. And there again, unless you're right there with the books in front of you, you can't just off the cuff say "we'll cut this, cut that" because you don't want to hurt people either. Man at State Fair I'm very uncomfortable with extreme views on either end of the spectrum and I believe that %uh a win-win situation needs to occur for the populace to %uh really benefit from any of the programs. Man at state fair: Is he going to increase taxes? Or is he going to increase revenues or what? What's going to go on? I'd like to know just exactly how he's going to balance the budget. ML: OK, let's talk taxes more here and specifically how some of that tax impact could Hit folks over fifty. That's that focus tonight. Let's start with you, Tom Horner and your plan to tax services. Sales taxes on services... TH: Well, but, but keep in mind in the overall plan is lower the tax rate, so those people buying big ticket items appliances, furniture actually are going to pay a little bit less in in sales tax And then yes that would expand the to to clothing and and services. Not business the business services, some personal services. That's in line with other states... ML: How about the personal services. Might seniors use more personal services? Could it effect them disproportionately? TH:No,I think it's going to affect everybody fairly ML: Is it? OK. TH:Because I do have 350 million dollars in there to make sure that we're not taxing low income middle income unfairly. You know, my budget says look we're all in this together were all going to have to share a little bit of the sacrifice to dig out of that the six billion dollar hole that is being left to the next governor. I think that's the responsible way to go. ML: Representative Emmer, you're going to be cutting local aid and local government aid cuts under governor Pawlenty, many say resulted in property tax increases. Could property tax increases disproportionately hurt seniors and folks over fifty? TE: Well, you asked me two different questions. I mean if local units of government are going to insist on that giving raises that are out of line it to the private sector. I mean I ask people all the time, Mary when I go in, how much of a raise did you get this year? And most people say I didn't get a raise or I don't have a job right ML: But a lot of mayors are saying that property taxes could go up under your plan. this year beyond I hope it will that's when you have people in a different cities that are giving their public employees three percent or more increases at a time when we're suffering we don't look at with local governments to an end and please when we talk about local government what I propose with this I don't know how many of your viewers understand that only about half the city's in this state get any local government aid and frankly only a handful get the lion's share what we propose to do is make sure that local government aid applies to those things that was intended to in communities that have supported by services like police and fire sure and water infrastructure that's where it should be it should be categorical but that actually will benefits cities right now that are not getting an upcoming time could go up as a result of that makes a local issue no I don't think it's fair it take to connect it to it's not fair I think those mayors that say that they did take a hard look at their budget as a is the only one up here who sat in the city council who's been through this I can tell you that is a decision for the local unit of government many many cities right now Mary our budgeting without any local government aid and again we said it should be categorical government should provide for public safety for fire of protection for soaring water infrastructure those communities that don't have that economic ability will get that in Saturday you know you can have ten reach for your revenue play and then finding out that two billion dollar hole how could that affect seniors what other taxes are you looking at at an income tax ten years could be a battle by the income tax to on the upper income and again my proposal to cut back some less than four percent of taxpayers of the there might be a few the wealthy seniors be asking to pay a little more or some more but young people are middle class of people and and seniors who %uh ron and on fixed incomes are are not going to be affected and and you know it with all due respect I think property taxes and I believe a lot of business people remember governor Clinton and department which we would reserve forty cents for every dollar reduction and local government accounting property taxes go up but sixty seven cents so in property taxes go up that's the most unfair tax on the gain program is as the middle class pays about five times more percent of their income in property taxes on the wealthiest people in minnesota and sales tax at about two and half times more so you like to have the mental health belfast now very very well in his role as a balancer regressive tax so you're not ninety five sales tax your know at the end of our revenue again so those the US off people you know sort of there's four percentage of their income in state local taxes than everyone else that's the definition a regressive tax system overall so just to make it fairer to Steve in and out so what these people are paying of the fair share thaksin in a more progressive now more aggressive okay let what's on up a little bit each in their own talk to an opponent hearing and point out are ask a question about some of laws are questions you may have about each other's budget plan I mean it's out there let's jump in it's an opportunity but but can represent them are just following up on the last comment the the the the EU which that led the charge during the the up primary campaign would be in the %uh the endorsement campaign by your opponent that when you are a member of the delegates at the council that you voted for sixteen percent increase in property taxes and specifically said that this is a result of cuts in state funding would your response was a city council member a I can't tell you when you look at numbers he's got to look at a time I don't know what I you whether you you know the numbers you're talking about %uh it whether they're real he might well as well back in locked up it was exactly the %uh the algae a issue that we're talking about and guess what as he had never the city council in the city delaware we did exactly what we were supposed to do we were very responsible the budget and that's what cities need to do right now happy Islamic here's what I would day send back to both of you let's say it's all right to talk about numbers but the year short in your budget Senator by about %uh two billion dollars you've been very gracious acknowledging that you've got this big hole in that figure out how to fill it by it mister porter you you've got about two billion dollar hole in your so-called budget is well I put out a balanced budget that lives within our means the the state government in the state of minnesota will have roughly thirty three billion dollars to spend the next tightening we have made the hard what's your question and the answer is that our children's and we talk about the budget that's balanced I've shown people put our cards on the table and citizens what we're going to do I'm asking you that's where you going to cut because all you're telling minnesota right now as these of the wonderful things I want to do for but where you going to cut is a public safety is that the judiciary where are you going to cut is the answer that yes he did propose a sixty percent increase in profits I answer that we can read the onset budget the way we're still low sixteen said I don't even know there was a sense there was a levee back with know you've got that wrong question I'm asking so could you crack that Hamas will increase was going to cut the taxes on member was minimal and in terms of what the citizens of don't they but here's what it was it should be for police and fire services time if you look right now so you don't know just like it any local government a what does the city bombing to get busy dying to get the you know no but I think that we ought to have all the government assistance the and inouye that delivers court essential public services helps those communities make sure that they can deliver services out but I also believe that I resorted to a we agree because what he's talking about a lot but what always be more police fire so really what our infrastructure in minneapolis do you have any idea Senator how much minneapolis get some local government of the rumors have been around for one of the pillars of numerically alone prisoner of war is very much in women at the time I thought I thought about it let me just finish up here because according to the coalition of retirement to other cities forty percent of their member communities before the twenty two and cuts have to make cuts in fire and police so at the level that why because they weren't getting enough assistance how does the economy was down why does government ever cut police and fire instead of cutting golf courses instead of cutting because already capital luxuries why would you do that time UN fired him and I think that's the point where prison those are the kinds of things that are saying that is not something I didn't like it and I think that is the point where there were no more luxuries left but they don't have those luxury that they're having to testify truthfully says honest about it that's entertainment they thought that they were visibly thinner President in finally of the long-term forty days after he was endorsed the his party he came close to the budget I give you credit for your candor and I remove the following of some next week with more what my dilemma is then you're out that your criminalists about the country making but I just think that drastic cuts for fourteen percent for higher education I don't control the education you couldn't talk about the the out of five hundred million but they're there to be ten thousand more students in our public schools kindergarten through twelfth grade over the next two years and so the the the the actual per student a cut there is even greater and we're talking about health and human services us another remain about a we love the nineteen percent cut in the get into that somebody else who has handed us today these numbers I have but you can good is going to seniors because you know I mean over half of the formal department and services budget goes for the medical systems and for the elderly and for long-term care and this will give in to assume for talking about some of those services you know this weekend both parties and over twenty they've done a lot made a real effort to do keep those costs down and make those services cost effective and the reality is that as the population ages more more road the elderly citizens need those services so it may be either off problems you know that none of us create a six billion dollar deficit former governor of the legislature then have to solve there's no easy simple way to pretend otherwise and attended any these cuts are not going to have serious consequences for real minnesota citizens' lives %uh I think is is something like that I think is the right time what are the consequences of for health and human services people are going to lose eligibility I thank him and a half and no that's not asking too nobody's really we we can't say that of the federal play there's going to have to be waivers like the type that here's the problem and I think the public needs to understand because what did did we really are in a fork in the road you can either go the way that these two gentlemen suggest which is the way we've been doing it either continue to raise taxes whether it be more sales taxes or whether it's different taxes on what your respectfully Senator going to hit the middle class middle class you can either continue to deny our respectfully they are not mister perot you are going to are going to raise jurors regardless you going to raise taxes that we can agree on that you're going to raise taxes so in order for you from our government here's the problem Senator when you see that on cutting say health and human services and fact the budget we put out his six hundred fifty million dollars more in health and human services in the state is spending today tightening up your comment on a growth and their what but the real culprit to accommodate the growth which they're you haven't addressed the fact that health and human services is scheduled to go by thirty two percent in explaining President is that going to be turning people away and the more I learn about hair and fiber it should be and your priority should be children the honorable adults seniors that's who you should be taking care of our live coverage that is the goal hold them harmless but here's what we've got to talk about it if you're going to if you're not going to make decisions as to how you're going to reform these programs and hold the line live within our means health and human services if it grows at thirty two percent every two years will heat up the entire state budget by twenty twenty in if that happens then there will be no money no matter what you do for K-TWELVE for roads and bridges its efforts kind of government live with the and I have to say I'm not going to let you know very clear on that let's get it right you are going to raise taxes raise taxes on your adult city council member a couple of weeks ago at game fair you agree to raise sales tax because of that all right a couple of the the bill that said I don't know anything else to add sir that you actually supported honest with folks and get them out are you rejecting the sales tax increase for the elected on a legacy amendment but when I raise in any more taxes you did it you did agree to raise that tax rate on you heard what we did we did agree to raise that had the primaries are in our hands extracting that fact I've developed a legacy and I mean I didn't vote for the last season but attacks that had threatened to of abuse are a lot that's what we're dealing with the issue that is they presented you'll with your bill to repeal legacy amendment then use that I no longer support this collect senate memorize in mostar right that then you're a to try to repeal it to a large extent we will have a man dressed issue should do anything else I did not support a tax increase the lesson that are angry not only on the state budget now and talk about some other economic issues helped us dear God let's go back to the state fair I know what it is that kind of thing we asked them about job I looked like he just moved up their talking about fourteen months ago among whites had a real hard time finding work and I know people in other places are having a lot more trouble right now I think the best way to find jobs is to be competitive well I see the biggest challenge right now are a that it's a I spent many years in the for her roles coming up from the bottom and never actually got a great so it is a struggle to see how going back at this point with the advent of it was not family I've been fortunate in that I I think it's more underemployed out there working at jobs that are really don't want a graduated from college and they can't find a physician and they are so what you're saying the people I mean no one is %uh hospital workers another is %uh in the medical field both of them lost their jobs both the more exciting activity there on specific fields %uh they can't get hired because corporate has taken over some of those responsibilities so they're looking at jobs that are much less they in previous and reduce benefits lot of course growing our economy is the most important ask making sure that to find front line I think they're gonna the next governor could be critical in helping at the other our problem is age and there is no need for many legally but let's face it in the real world that can be a challenge hundred eighteen take this one first when we hear about folks trying to find work it seems like those older than fifty are having a harder time that are laid off for a Foster child finding employment what will you do as governor to help them get jobs world from but these are ordinary he has really affects those Olmert fifty bodies that young people coming out of college as well you know I I had to have had you worked for the last the great job governor of minnesota refurbish of coming out of the nineteen eighty two recession and %uh you know he'd be was a part-time job as governor as I intend to be in in the shop around and literally that of a million-dollar bounty bill next year uncertain of you know there's another trial was with interest rates from all of us the opportunity studies say that the million dollars in public projects Europe reach twenty eight thousand jobs in the private channel for example fact and our affiliate rates are as low as they are we rank low ruble among the states or Canada in having of of the internet for ratio and the the stadium is another eight thousand jobs over three years putting people back to work there are proposing energy savings bonds I think the reason I keep going and I think that's an indicator of people stadium no PHD in will be in the best interest of people in this world for the economic benefits foreign compared to the cost of the would not good come out of the general fund my attorney said his client it takes a these example from the original so tomorrow's where they have retreated into buildings for more efficient energy use that creates jobs that seventeen cooling system to use alternative energy they're buying the corner of stocks from the reformers which money into the local economy how about you ma'am the gas applying it is a billion dollars in energy costs related to replicate that kind of approach real estate college and university polling institute and the north state government local government the %uh schools around the state and we could transform the public sector use of energy in our state put people to work in those projects a victim of taxpayer energy costs and bring that alternative energy industry to minnesota for the future and some are attacked by a jobs plan there can you five how it can help older folks people over fifty absolutely because part of what I'm proposing he is that we strengthen higher education and particularly our two years schools and we tie them indirectly to the the regional economies into businesses that's what the opportunity to provide lifelong learning to give people new skills but also to create new jobs with the local industries the and jobs that that are appropriate to the population of people have heart attacks afford to go back to school we're going to have to provide some way to to make them of do to make it affordable part of that is how we as a state decide to fund a career schools so that it is affordable we can't afford to leave fifty fifty five-year-old out there I'm and and just pull the rug out from under them so part of it also though married is we need to make employing people affordable and so we do need to manage the cost of health care and when we undermine the the the the cost of of health care when we leave people boehner of all to to health care force them into emergency rooms in the same kind of thing that's happening now with the general assistance medical care were people are forced into emergency rooms the hospital's up are about to take action but with but that cost get shifted to the employer that makes it more expensive to hire people so we have to have responsible health care program for everybody in minnesota that does keep health costs affordable that does make it possible for people to hide from players to hire older workers are kids that are hurrying to create jobs especially for men over fifty as the tax cut do that that %uh say I mean there's are i'll explain it but I just listened to my colleagues and they have great ideas they want to %uh put money into %uh government projects they want to invest that in higher education all kinds of things they're very laudable but if you don't create jobs if you don't have a growing vibrant private economy you can't do any of these wonderful things we're talking about and I think that's what it's all about I you don't wait to do the CIA these tax policies you doing right away and twenty eleven he get it moving you take allow the taken from what I've heard a lot charlie take a look at a time not helped I'm a little bit that you were asking him about that caller even a calculate jobs while like I don't know it's only that he had government people that say honey jobs you can create as we know government doesn't create jobs people create jobs you need to give them an opportunity in the marketplace in their own resources give them the ability to create those jobs and then sky's the limit it's up to them if you will for young and there are a lot of bills and more structured products great architect government and that's why I said that this interview that'sa laudable but you don't and if you don't have a growing at the private economy if you don't create an environment with lower taxes with less regulation or streamlined anyway regulations so that existing businesses can start to grow again start a hired hand and so that new investment private investment can come to the state of minnesota if you're not growing your private economy you're not going to have the funds to pay for all these wonderful things that have gone and I know you don't like any of the binding bill so far is there a binding bill which not democrats called jobs bill is it is it when you could support of governer of absolutely and I think if you look at the budget that I put out fortnight infrastructure in emergency issues %uh it is in the budget does that create as many jobs it wasn't know it's a restructuring plan to the right now we've been focusing all on bombing bills and there's a place for bonds motion for by projects of statewide and regional significance with capital long-term improvements absolutely %uh but if you're going to pay for those if you can't pay the debt service if you can't pay for the services that we want purchased from government again Mary you have to start growing jobs again in the state of minnesota but here's the problem here's the problem what representative have our with all due respect and I do admire that you've you put on the budget I think all of us have put out a lot of good information for the people to see and evaluate but what you're really proposing is the last eight years that's correct and the problem with that is that in the last two decade in good years and bad minnesota his late the nation in job growth we're not growing at a rate as fast as we'd need to we have economic the problem with that a opportunities that are losing their leading minnesota and yes we ought to be concerned about every job that leaves whether it's helped put up or any other state but what we've really ought to be concerned with are those good career cutting edge economy jobs they're going to Wisconsin that are going to other states that are going to other countries and they're doing that with the research that is being created at the university of minnesota with the talent pool that is being educated and of minnesota schools and then moving out of state that's what we can't afford whatever you need to maintain it's in that context we need to maintain %uh healthy %uh up a education system that that the higher-level that K-TWELVE because long term are distinctive advantage what will grow the good jobs will be our talent cool and we need to make sure it's the best in the nation that time really you know that the last eight years that what we're proposing has not happened but at all you know and I know that that your job has been representing people influencing government you've worked on them rail project of you work for hospitals influencing government see you know the the problems that they face you've got were proposing taking the %uh corporate franchise tax in reducing it by a couple points which will put three hundred sixty three million dollars into the pockets of our players but that hasn't happened in the last twenty years or senate and the higher he said oh absolutely well the this is important I don't find any minute now Gary care lot of the in addition the land well that's true of the club's ex senate aide the island of voters lived premature of the importance of higher education all the education certainly but reestablishing the original shows action on some key reason they're going to be computer crucial whether it's scientific research that militant attack in the administration and it's just a tiny well we need to reestablish excellent you know in the university of minnesota medical school at harvard medical school bus senior college in Fort Smith of oppression I change my mind but back in the hands of those in the top aide to medical schools the country now works ranked well for primary care what the FAA thirtieth for research no we well this is the most investors looking for federal resources have been in the private sector to collaborate in the coming weeks and months of misery now with the new President ever city and saying they're worried I had one of the strategies we need so we can be the best of things are really a payoff for the future and so that's a mandate for one grant institutions such as the christians or mister campuses there's a greater minnesota the same role play but and educating the young people then the older people will go back to school so that they can indeed be trained and ready for the jobs of the future is the key role of education and and those are the best paying jobs well-educated people are going to have higher paid jobs your point though the new to say it isn't just money in some cases it is money and we need to be honest with minnesotans we need to state that we do need to make investments we ought to fund research at the university of minnesota and other two and four years schools we ought to make college affordable we ought to make sure that we have the best-educated talent pool we need to do a widely efficiently smartly absolutely but when we stopped making investments in the future we will be a debate on the slide mediocrity in that we're not going to be on next week minnesota you tell 'em what taxes you're going to raise I think that have no you haven't told them that if I happen to have shortfall but it's also going to continue staffed by what's her his friends well known that he was asking about the the tax proposal I've been very clear whether the lower the rate on the sell side and the rodhams in taxes again race if you're not going to tell minnesota the two billion dollar hole that you have to the moderates were going to lower the rate on the sales tax brought in the basin to include clothing and some services I'm going to close some tax expenditures some of the deductions and credits to go to the wealthy because I do agree that needs to be some more equity and fairness senate we are going to be increased taxes on tobacco and alcohol instead what I say us you get a tax cut is not yet again a kind of put it at right but when you do that station at a location I don't have to be included to get your two point one five billion on taxes you the only one we ought to worry about up to the only reason we ought to worry about corruption old is that you guys get your plants through for all the people who will be leaving minnesota okay company well that's not entirely question here the fact is that may be the most using taking a look at some of the other issues of importance to defendant ever fifty for example health care and long-term care let's take a look at what is being done to stop it the pope is something wrong with is very important and I would hope that they would have a lot of you and I think that's a short-term opportunity is one of the biggest challenges that we face the music and the issue and that's the future of an ancient economy and that big issue on yes I would like to know what policies they would propose to protect minnesota citizens from floods and stay I do think for that everyone has health care and painful sell-off because we have a situation where people can be in the system not have health care and then walking the house believes that taxpayers pick it up and that's not fair to those most places preventative health care so it's not emergency number other people are being sure but it's they're being served at the high spots educational the state fallen off the it was education the here to forgive I want a governor to leave %uh to lead in a progressive manner I like to get some of the issues that people are concerned about settled in salt totally agent dignity out early educate our kids %uh police chief for retirement those kinds of things let's take health care represent and I think in the press have carefully said they would not opted to federal health care tell us why not and what other federal programs would you turn out what other sources of money do not want from the Fed well at that the last five the hypothetical is it appropriate I think every every new program that is sent to minnesota by congress should be evaluated be an ex-governor the next legislature in going off in the future should always be doing the due diligence in evaluating what is minnesota getting versus water we are bleeding future minnesotans record turnout other parts of the federal money or open to doing that by I think you get a value it everything and I won't give you a yea or nay again every program has to be evaluated on its own merits what are we opting into in where the long term financial liabilities for the state of minnesota because obviously if you're taking on long-term financial liability suit you may not be able to pay for you shouldn't be accepting those until you understand what those ramifications are that would be really happy and that could mean I know these gentlemen feel differently but it's at four hundred thirty million dollars have over the next three years number one that's what is could cost the state but number two hey if you look at the way minnesota is innovative minnesota is design figured out how to provide high-quality care at a low cost unfortunately the federal programs is not it doesn't reimburses based on that based on high quality low cost instead the federal government reimburses based on volume of care I I don't think that's the right answer for the future of minnesota in addition to the financial viability in problematic real kind Y captain if it's going to cost us money isn't it's a net one hundred eighty eight million dollars visit the oval office is another as a political issue and the governor provided for in the budget for the next plane him they would bring one point four billion dollars for the seven or return for the state the road and and three fours of Medicaid the spending goals for the elderly and people with disabilities so it in this is going to provide a better reporting medical care to the elderly and people with disabilities throughout the state is crucial to lou the rural hospitals why is the minnesota medical association called perot's minnesota chamber of commerce call for this minnesota hospital association called for the use of private sector people understand but that money is essential special in greater minnesota to the financial stability of these hospitals in their building by good quality care for everyone that's how it got there because if hospitals opposed it chamber photograph as a matter of those there groups say seen you on your side and they're not on the absolutely will they will be any well I have a lot of respect for Senator I I think you might want to check these numbers to because %uh what you're suggesting is just simply not true been a lot of her mother listen I'm not sure well no I can't because position there wasn't a real this one hundred eighty nine that hello I well I I didn't you'd be better check those numbers I mean much like the %uh so-called budget that you put out the numbers you given right now don't add up that's not what's going to happen and frankly if you're gonna lead this time it stopped doing things auto automatically the way we've been doing because that's what you're proposing if you do this even if you were right and I I'm she respectfully submit you're not that a even if you were right will be right back in this soup within four to six years and then you be talking to the good people of the state of minnesota to our hospitals to the end I mean all these different interest groups and saying now what we do when we solve it right now structurally going forward so that we can get on the right path and I couldn't agree more we do have to change how we do things and tonight the the update it's really not mean I agree with me that we ought to do that opted but not too much to get the federal dollars but to do health care well because what we have been doing and what we do need to change is exactly what we saw with general assistance medical care the health care program for low-income people the represented them are and others tried to to abandoned and and of push away and the problem is that when you just do that you don't save money you just transfer that money he transferred to hospitals the transfer to property taxpayers in hennepin county who now have to pay for a GMC because the the people who need care are coming into the emergency rooms and as a former employer I know that you also transferred to insurance premiums you transfer to the cost of business the transfer to the cost of health care on purchases and most of all what we've done in minnesota and what represent of the camera %uh and and I think Senator didn't in their budgets proposed to to continue is dead we haven't really addressed some of the most significant structural cost of that is I would just keep that transfer in the cost to providers and so we asked nursing homes deliver care for less than your call we have hospitals doctors dentist the liver care for less than it cost yeah he looks good on paper it looks good in your budget it's not real cost savings are you really think often have carried with correct and the reality is again the mean the eastern nursing homes or fifty one of our business minnesota since two thousand one and what were under reimburse nursing homes and yet that's one of the ways the legislature and the governor try to keep costs down well we have been going from eighty percent of our long-term care costs in nursing homes to seven one percent by using the elderly waiters for in-home care for that the seniors who want to stay in their homes and yet you know the cost that's going up is still less than half of all the cost of a nursing home so there's some of these things have been taken and the reality is we're awful lot eight thousand people at the and two thousand six of these only way you're so almost nineteen thousand now there's more people getting old and burt and there were some I don't know I'm not going to be dealing with us for the next decade is these pictures and that's going to cut the to to turn our back on on federal money when we send more money many to in Washington we get back and then jeopardize the financial stability of hospitals and providers doctors were on the scene is is I think just well speaking of getting all President Obama recently said that he had is living well do any of you have living well and I don't think I don't have one how should people deal with and of white issued you have strong opinions on crucial the side when I think that that and I think they should but I want to go back to that stuff like that you're going to be an opportunity because %uh it's Saturday that's just patently false when you suggest the governor and the legislature have been that trying to squeeze nursing homes in fact there's a letter that I sang that to with several of my colleagues that were asking to increased funding the nursing homes we try to do it several times over the last six years I have no idea if mister harmon you know you can keep talking about all these investments but you know what you are changing the thing when it comes to health care in fact we were in a debate the other night we suggested the doctors well frankly are really suffering because they haven't had Medicare Medicaid reimbursements adjusted in years many of them are providing cost the services at the low-cost and isn't just the bridges cannot opt into every program that comes in that would continue that type of that treatment of our physicians is not going to promote number one judd gregg high quality care at low cost but more importantly it's not going to promote the next generation of physicians which we absolutely have to be concerned about in this state and that that's what I would we're proposing represent November I would agree with you that I would be wrong fortunately I don't have to make that acknowledgment because that's not what I meant I am proposing I do think we ought to take the optimists a medic because they can save money he can provide better health care it can lead us to a path of reform and we have done a good job in minnesota we are starting the path of coordinating care for those with chronic conditions we are starting on the path of I'm paying for for quality not just for quantity but I believe we also need to keep on the path of investing in prevention of spending money to help will stay healthy because that has a long-term benefit but then we also I just want to to have to reject are you really saying but the legislative actions and the governor over the last six years have not reduce reimbursements for nursing homes won't work for a client is what I'm saying is that we have fought for more by increases for nursing homes and frankly time i'll tell you what if we're in the governor's office I put it in a budget which you have not you talk about enough money in there for increases respectfully if you would tell minnesota which you're actually going to raise in terms of taxes annual tell minnesota house what you're going to cut well we talked about these increasing the health and human services budget and we're talking about nursing homes senior house that's all that I don't see any reason why it can't be just the to hear that none of the case when you see increased your budget by six hundred fifty million dollars is that all right that doesn't even cover the cost of the cuts that have already died at the hands of the question Senator David vitter said he had a living welfare was some kind of like issues who should decide I'm into place like his son's third in line with mine living will to make those decisions and I mean these are very difficult the full citizens are you know I I think those are that still left to the individual is your family and and and physician mister Carter living will Bush who should decide and and of light all the things that you can't what book but that doesn't believe that living wills so that you prepare for those circumstances definitely doing and that is why you plan ahead I think it ought to be with the the that the family and and that it ought to be %uh a collective decision and ideally it ought to be done what everybody is as healthy and has the fact that he's had to make a good judgment okay but but what I also believe that that that is the role for for physicians to help council to understand what the decisions are not to move you in one direction or another but these are complicated issues and not everybody understands what if perot it measures mean and so we ought to have that kind of discussion and so I would hope that as we get more sophisticated as we take some of the politics out of these issues the weekend asked backers and reimbursed doctors to help lead people through these kinds of conversations pay a lot of these issues health care air funding bill the budget are going to take work with the legislature an aide very likely to get a bipartisan vote you're going have to shore up support in the legislature aside about out each of you can crossed partisan lines we've heard some of our it isn't saying nonpartisan much across partisan lines hundred eighteen since you had to run against the speaker of the house there was a little bit more challenging for you to get legislative support talk about how you're going to shore up democrats and also republicans and get their support for nearly six years as the were from republican President and the republican majority in the suffer for have low six years of age last year for example and worked with us Senator John McCain and also the nature of the senate appropriations committee ted stevens and the rest in peace to get the first congressional funding for a program beyond the already I want to thank the entire national guard are you reaching a lot here is the nine years old getting through different stages and the ones that is why the state agencies serve in the executive branch the government and I worked there was solicitor finally lawmakers that there are now so %uh for the republican group the house was republican too rigid for a couple of years and I pride myself on working with everyone who could work with me I think you treat people respectfully so believe we know they're elected and each in their own right and rumors all of us disagreements but I've always treated people in government perspectives on a small level people is as they are and there was anything about democracy so we have different points of view in perspective it was the country's only of one political party or one candidate to choose from the much worse government's than we have in our state of minnesota and we can we have the force led by a person try a person nonpartisan we have a of high quality of government that people people in government and in the legislature and I look for working with them off under arguing over legislators usually had a meeting with a few who needed to be covered and right on the world scene team were you were in a vehicle for doing it in a strong effort underway and some of the some of them may have different points of view and that's to be respected honored and welcomed think I represent Iraq tell me how you're going to work not just across the aisle with democrats but also with your own party you know you ran from leader of your party when I left it so they're still stunned trade relationships with fellow republicans even when your caucus went to see the governor he did not follow along and and is that some of those governor meetings which India senate republicans didn't show up that your office if you were governor well Mary I think you're creating things were nothing exists that mean a had a great relationships with people on both sides of the fence get some meetings with their caucus that ended without and that that fifty percent of caucus and is not and I I'm not sure why you decided to keep that track of where I was and I would there's drive them out of the cockpit nice to have your attention to he asked not I think it's a it's being proactive it's being that clear an honest about what you would propose to do and then that had been consistent all the way through you gotta get respect of your colleagues you also have to worry they may not agree with you but as long as they know that what you say you mean acting makes a lot easier to work together and then I would also suggest you know I put out the jobs creation agenda which a has not been enacted contrary to what %uh %uh my colleague here you suggested that we need to do in the state of minnesota create jobs and guess what the things that I've proposed in my budget proposal job creation proposal maybe not the budget itself has that's going to cause a lot of work by a lot of people living within our means making sure the government lives within its means but the job creation agenda has been supported by republicans and democrats alike bit different votes in the legislature all right now Senator Davis tax the rich that proposal had seven votes in the minnesota house and at time warner their sales tax proposal that you might find one or two votes in the house but I challenge you to find twenty people would actually support that so it's it's not just being proactive in terms of working with people this is what we need to do what and why that's not being clear and honest about what you propose to do in and listen to them work with them and put out things that they'll agree that Tom horner how do you reach out us on republicans that your former republican mayor a little team that you for leading the party and we watched jesse ventura struggle to work with lawmakers to a legal issue here is the first two years he was very successful by telling his popularity ratings are down lawmakers are enlisted men and he wanted to do some things that that baby opened the door to that so one and I think that all of that starts actually in the kind of campaign you Brian in how the you the preacher your fellow candidates in the respect that you have for the public and so I'm the candidate that has said I will not run any negative advertising in my campaign not a single ad and I will abide by that even though as I gained momentum you can imagine that the attack ads are going to come from the independent expenditure groups I'm going to keep it a positive campaign I think that sets a tone that allows me then table into the governor's office to appoint the kind of cabinet that adjustment were ahead every lacks a broad cross-section of of minnesota for the best and the brightest were there not because I've always special favor to this group or that group but because they know how to get the job done but beyond that marry when you look at the kinds of proposals that I have put out the the senate paxon leadership Senator boxer to rest some of the most respected democratic members on on taxes sales taxes the the the way to go when you look at editorial surrounding statement kato they said my budget is the best our no one at the most respected federal reserve economists look at the three budgets ted my most the best former governor arne carlson I mean it just goes on and on and on were people around the state from both parties he and objective observers are saying it's my leadership it's my vision it's my proposal that represents the best interest of minnesota because what I'm saying is we can't just put all of the burden on the poor and we can't just put all of the burden on the wealthy we have to have a budget that works for all the muscles were all in this together and we all have to share can you get into a runoff election is the usual assortment of suicide for himself or herself which of our budget proposal in their best interest of Paul wellstone that verdict and that's one reason that the I won the primaries because people recognize that I was going to protect the middle class a from tax increases and they're the same property taxes et cetera were the most unfair tax a despite this no new taxes' mantra last year is cooper of the from four billion naira and governor Clinton promised a seven billion and and because the people have passed the buck it's easier to say okay well we're not gonna make those tough decisions and it's a level of this let local governments school board members and city council members county commission we've also cut that's why it was our readiness as if you cut of our local assistance in school systems property taxes go up the most unfair attacks that's why I think people recognize the mind protection middle class the end of the third and final picture in about one minute each we heard something in the tape they talk about vision and leadership tell us how your leadership style is going to be different and the bass especially for folks over fifty represent honor the you have a choice November second will be a choice it'll be a choice between doing what minnesota has been doing over the last several decades had that these two gentlemen offer which simply is we're going to continue to raise taxes that's the answer is that it doesn't matter from where we're going to raise taxes we're going to continue to feed government and it we need something new we needed to have government be more efficient and deliver the services people expect in affordable and sustainable manner but the more important one to do all the wonderful things that people in minnesota have come to expect we can start growing jobs in the private sector again we have put this on the back to work because that is what ultimately wolf fund our nursing homes in fund all the different programs that we expect minnesota painful time and final to well so I think this issue this campaign is about leadership and my vision from minnesota is a state that says to all minnesotans look we have a bad big hole all that was left was we haven't even talked about the problem of public pensions of underfunded infrastructure it's not just the six billion dollars shortfall it's all of the shortfalls that we have to deal with we better be investing in the future in creating opportunity and you don't do that just by cutting back I'm education on health care on research you do it by but making smart decisions by investing for the future and so my pitch is that if minnesotans one boy eight leadership in the governor's office on in January of twenty eleven it only starts with bold leadership by voters on November second and dayton the seniors remember that the border of the thirty five years of my life to public service and so on and %uh that they remember that I the revised senate salary to them and so does the new federation to support of both trips in which the music and the where they can buy much more cost prescription drugs on the US side the for close the door whole all which are unfairly penalize is our seniors and burns and lewis chester those unlimited and fixed incomes with those those unnecessarily higher prescription drug costs and they care about the the children grandchildren and their future which is why my commitment to education increasing funding for public a twelve education subri early childhood education recognition that there are young people are our future and also provide the support of for those in their retirement years the liberals and secure a government owned and they'll help the lawyers we have one quick thing to get one last question how long did each one has their more than a term a pit where were running for a four year term the not serve more than a walk one for a return a look back on it I don't have a living will it get to you in this okay I think that that yeah i'll go and i'll be a political lightning rod all take the hit will bring democrats republicans together i'll give them cover I would never make a pledge to be a one-term governor but if the consequences of doing the right things cause we not to be reelected I'm okay with that return who were the people of minnesota well it's serve the two terms of we'll take that long to straighten up the mess we're in today in the crib and so on thank you so much gentlemen for very glad you joined us tonight for this conversation with candidates for governor special thanks to our partner in this debate a are key we remind you to register to vote election day is Tuesday November second and every watch this debate and learn more information on this year's governor's race skinhead garb web site that DPT dot O R G it again TPG that word thanks again for tuning in tonight good night